mark leibovich, this town: two parties and a funeral - plus, plenty of valet parking! - in america's gilded capital
let us be dissatisfied

what i watched last week

Take Shelter (Jeff Nichols, 2011). There are enough things going on in Take Shelter that it is difficult to pin it down to one easy description (it’s like M. Night Shyamalan only good, it’s a horror story, it’s really about the poor state of the American economy, it’s a finely-detailed portrait of a schizophrenic). At times, I admit to being caught by surprise … whenever I thought I had the movie tagged, it moved in a slightly different direction. Everything improved once I gave myself over to Nichols’ vision, rather than trying to categorize the film from my own preconceptions. Take Shelter is not one of those insular, mysterious movies I usually dismiss; whatever fuzziness occurs is part of the representation of the life of the main character, who can’t always tell what is real and what is not. As is usually the case with movies about people struggling with psychological problems, I spent a lot of the film wavering between “been there, done that” and “I don’t like seeing myself on the screen”. My connection to this aspect of the movie means I paid less attention to the milieu of economic collapse than I should have. It is unfair to complain about Michael Shannon doing what he does so well, and he is very good here. Nonetheless, it’s hard to avoid the feeling that we’ve seen Shannon do this many times. More impressive is Jessica Chastain, who is excellent as the wife who wants to make things right for her husband but is fiercely frustrated that she can’t understand what he is going through. Chastain reminds us that the tortured individual causes collateral damage. #226 on the They Shoot Pictures, Don’t They list of the top 250 films of the 21st century. 8/10.

Hud (Martin Ritt, 1963). Sometimes it’s hard to figure out the logic of the Oscars. Hud was regarded highly enough to receive seven Oscar nominations, including Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Actor, Best Actress, and Best Supporting Actress. It won three Oscars, two for acting, one for James Wong Howe’s cinematography. But it wasn’t nominated for Best Picture, although there was somehow room for the legendary Taylor-Burton Cleopatra. Hud is an interesting, if schizophrenic, movie. The message seems to be that Paul Newman’s title character is a pure bastard, and, if you want to dig deeper, Hud, who “doesn’t care about people”, represents the emptiness of modern life. But, as played by Newman, Hud is the liveliest thing in the movie. His father, played by the Oscar-winning Melvyn Douglas, is sanctimonious, his nephew, played by Shane’s Brandon de Wilde, is a literary construct more than a person, leaving only Patricia Neal (also an Oscar winner) as the only person besides Newman who manages to get our attention. It’s an amoral movie … not that that’s a bad thing. In fact, that’s what makes it fun to watch. 7/10.

La Jetée (Chris Marker, 1962, 10/10), and 12 Monkeys (Terry Gilliam, 1995, 8/10).



I'll give you the conception of Douglas's character, but I think his performance is fine. No problem at all with Brandon de Wilde--I mean, something like The Searchers has lots of characters that are literary constructs, that kind of goes with the territory in Westerns (and death-of-the-Westerns, like Hud). Newman has a great time, like all great actors playing bad guys, and Neal gives just about my favourite female performance in any film ever.

Interesting, if schizophrenic--Take Shelter! (Liked this year's Mud better.)

Steven Rubio

Can't disagree with anything you say. I appreciate that Neal is so good without resorting to the kind of flamboyance that usually wins Oscars. Douglas is indeed solid. Brandon de Wilde? I preferred Sal Mineo in Rebel Without a Cause :-).


For me, there are two great echoes in Hud. I went back to Facebook, and one of them I mentioned in the Hud comments: the way the film's ending, specifically de Wilde's presence, is an inversion of Shane's ending. The other is a powerful inversion too: how Homer having to kill all his cattle brings to mind the cattle drive in Red River, the way Wayne tells Clift to "Take 'em to Missouri, Matt."

Steven Rubio

Thanks for reminding me you had Hud on your list! I'd forgotten ... it isn't on my "watch the movies Phil chose" list because I'd seen it before.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)